Listening in polarised controversies: a study of listening practices in the public sphere
Carolyn M. Hendriks (),
Selen A. Ercan () and
Sonya Duus ()
Additional contact information
Carolyn M. Hendriks: Australian National University
Selen A. Ercan: University of Canberra
Sonya Duus: University of Canberra
Policy Sciences, 2019, vol. 52, issue 1, No 8, 137-151
Abstract:
Abstract Listening is an important feature of policy making and democratic politics. Yet in an era of increased polarisation the willingness and capacity of citizens to listen to each other, especially those they disagree with, is under strain. Drawing insights from a divisive community conflict over proposed coal seam gas development in regional Australia, this article examines how citizens listen to each other in a polarised controversy. The analysis identifies four different listening practices that citizens enact in a polarised public sphere, including (1) enclave listening between like-minded citizens; (2) alliance listening across different enclaves; (3) adversarial listening between citizens on opposing sides of the debate to monitor opponents; and (4) transformative listening where citizens listen selectively to other community members with the intention of changing their views. The article argues that all four listening practices fulfil important democratic functions in polarised debates such as enhancing the connective, reflective and communicative capacity of the public sphere. Notwithstanding these democratic contributions, under polarised conditions participatory interventions may be required to enhance the prospects of listening across difference.
Keywords: Listening; Polarisation; Democratic politics; Community conflict; Citizen engagement; Unconventional gas; Democracy; Energy; Public communication; Political communication (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11077-018-9343-3 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:policy:v:52:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s11077-018-9343-3
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... ce/journal/11077/PS2
DOI: 10.1007/s11077-018-9343-3
Access Statistics for this article
Policy Sciences is currently edited by Michael Howlett
More articles in Policy Sciences from Springer, Society of Policy Sciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().