Estimating Abortion Incidence: Assessment of a Widely Used Indirect Method

Susheela Singh (), Fatima Juarez, Elena Prada and Akinrinola Bankole
Additional contact information
Susheela Singh: Guttmacher Institute
Fatima Juarez: Guttmacher Institute
Elena Prada: Independent Consultant
Akinrinola Bankole: Guttmacher Institute

Population Research and Policy Review, 2019, vol. 38, issue 3, No 7, 429-458

Abstract: Abstract Induced abortion is a reproductive behavior that remains difficult to measure in countries where the procedure is highly restricted by law. Additionally, in some countries where abortion is broadly legal, a high proportion of abortions are carried out by illegal and untrained providers. In these contexts, official statistics are non-existent or highly incomplete. Measurement of the incidence of induced abortion is essential to inform sexual and reproductive health policies and programs. Researchers have developed diverse methodologies over the years. Direct methods, such as population-based surveys that ask women about their abortion experience, generally are subject to high levels of underreporting. A range of indirect methods have been developed to obtain more accurate estimates. Created in the early 1990s, the Abortion Incidence Complications Method (AICM) is a widely applied indirect method that has produced robust estimates of abortion incidence in a range of contexts. This paper presents the original AICM methodology used in countries where abortion is highly restricted. It also highlights modifications made for two situations, one of which is newly emerging. First, the methodology has been adapted recently for countries where, despite the restrictive abortion laws, a new, relatively safe method—medication abortion (mainly misoprostol alone)—is increasingly used. Second, it has been adapted for countries where abortion is broadly legal but unsafe abortion remains common. The paper also assesses performance of the methodology to the extent available data permit. The paper provides guidance to researchers who want to conduct abortion incidence studies using the AICM and to further advance the measurement of abortion incidence.

Keywords: Abortion incidence; Methodology; Abortion measurement in different legal contexts; Postabortion care (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11113-019-09517-2 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:poprpr:v:38:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s11113-019-09517-2

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... es/journal/11113/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s11113-019-09517-2

Access Statistics for this article

Population Research and Policy Review is currently edited by D.A. Swanson

More articles in Population Research and Policy Review from Springer, Southern Demographic Association (SDA)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().