Differences in Health Outcomes Between Millennials and Generation X in the USA: Evidence from the National Health Interview Survey

Rebekka DePew () and Gilbert Gonzales ()
Additional contact information
Rebekka DePew: Vanderbilt University School of Medicine
Gilbert Gonzales: Vanderbilt University School of Medicine

Population Research and Policy Review, 2020, vol. 39, issue 3, No 9, 605-616

Abstract: Abstract Millennials (born 1981–1996) are the largest portion of the US workforce, but very little research has examined and compared their health behaviors and health outcomes to previous generations. The purpose of this study was to compare health outcomes for Millennials (born 1981–1996) and Generation X-ers (born 1965–1980) at the same age. Data on 9602 Generation X-ers and 7786 Millennials aged 20–35 years were analyzed from the 2000 and 2016 National Health Interview Survey. Mental, physical, and functional health outcomes were compared across the two groups using prevalence estimates and multivariable logistic regression models controlling for sociodemographic characteristics and risk factors. Compared to Generation X-ers who were 20–35 years of age in 2000, Millennials aged 20–35 in 2016 were more educated than Generation X-ers, but Millennials were more likely to live in poverty than Generation X-ers. Millennials were less likely to smoke than Generation X-ers at the same age and had improved health insurance coverage, but they were more likely to be obese. After controlling for sociodemographic variables, Millennials were more likely to report poor/fair self-rated health, chronic conditions, needing assistance with activities of daily living, and moderate-to-severe psychological distress compared to Generation X-ers of the same age. More research and innovative public health initiatives should focus on improving the health of the 73 million Millennials in the United States.

Keywords: United States; Healthcare access; Health behaviors; Millennials; Chronic disease; Health outcomes (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11113-019-09563-w Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:poprpr:v:39:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s11113-019-09563-w

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... es/journal/11113/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s11113-019-09563-w

Access Statistics for this article

Population Research and Policy Review is currently edited by D.A. Swanson

More articles in Population Research and Policy Review from Springer, Southern Demographic Association (SDA)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().