Change in U.S. Small Town Community Capitals, 1980–2010
Lori M. Hunter (),
Catherine B. Talbot,
Dylan Shane Connor,
Miriam Counterman,
Johannes H. Uhl,
Myron P. Gutmann and
Stefan Leyk
Additional contact information
Lori M. Hunter: University of Colorado Boulder
Catherine B. Talbot: University of Colorado Boulder
Dylan Shane Connor: Arizona State University
Miriam Counterman: University of Colorado Boulder
Johannes H. Uhl: University of Colorado Boulder
Myron P. Gutmann: University of Colorado Boulder
Stefan Leyk: University of Colorado Boulder
Population Research and Policy Review, 2020, vol. 39, issue 5, No 7, 913-940
Abstract:
Abstract The county scale has thus far dominated rural demographic research—this descriptive profile of small town America is unique with its place-based lens. Another important extension is the nationwide application of the Community Capitals Framework which builds on the body of research examining capitals within case studies focused on one or more communities. Here, we examine place-based “community capitals” at the national scale through novel integration of data from a wide variety of sources. The goal is to identify tiny town socioeconomic and demographic patterns of change—or trajectories—over the past several decades—and contrast remote small towns with those proximate to metropolitan areas. Results reveal both commonalities and distinctions. Instead of differences in trends across time, the analyses suggest that what differs are the more general profiles of small places as contrasted with national data. For example, regardless of metro proximity, small town America has lower levels of human and financial capital. Still, distinction also appears in that rural population growth has focused on high-amenity regions, bringing some increases in community capitals but potentially also exacerbating inequalities. In all, the analyses presented here offer an important foundation for necessary work at the place scale to improve understanding of the nuances inherent in population shifts, and their implications, within rural communities.
Keywords: Rural; Population; Demography; Trends; Community capitals; Tiny towns (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11113-020-09609-4 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:poprpr:v:39:y:2020:i:5:d:10.1007_s11113-020-09609-4
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... es/journal/11113/PS2
DOI: 10.1007/s11113-020-09609-4
Access Statistics for this article
Population Research and Policy Review is currently edited by D.A. Swanson
More articles in Population Research and Policy Review from Springer, Southern Demographic Association (SDA)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().