The Role of Chance in the Census Bureau Database Reconstruction Experiment
Steven Ruggles () and
David Riper
Additional contact information
Steven Ruggles: University of Minnesota
David Riper: University of Minnesota
Population Research and Policy Review, 2022, vol. 41, issue 3, No 1, 788 pages
Abstract:
Abstract The Census Bureau plans a new approach to disclosure control for the 2020 census that will add noise to every statistic the agency produces for places below the state level. The Bureau argues the new approach is needed because the confidentiality of census responses is threatened by “database reconstruction,” a technique for inferring individual-level responses from tabular data. The Census Bureau constructed hypothetical individual-level census responses from public 2010 tabular data and matched them to internal census records and to outside sources. The Census Bureau did not compare these results to a null model to demonstrate that their success in matching would not be expected by chance. This is analogous to conducting a clinical trial without a control group. We implement a simple simulation to assess how many matches would be expected by chance. We demonstrate that most matches reported by the Census Bureau experiment would be expected randomly. To extend the metaphor of the clinical trial, the treatment and the placebo produced similar outcomes. The database reconstruction experiment therefore fails to demonstrate a credible threat to confidentiality.
Keywords: Census; Database reconstruction; Disclosure control; Differential privacy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11113-021-09674-3 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:poprpr:v:41:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s11113-021-09674-3
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... es/journal/11113/PS2
DOI: 10.1007/s11113-021-09674-3
Access Statistics for this article
Population Research and Policy Review is currently edited by D.A. Swanson
More articles in Population Research and Policy Review from Springer, Southern Demographic Association (SDA)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().