Politicians’ coherence and government debt
Giorgio Bellettini () and
Paolo Roberti ()
Additional contact information
Paolo Roberti: University of Bergamo
Public Choice, 2020, vol. 182, issue 1, No 4, 73-91
Abstract We model a society that values coherence between the long-term commitment of politicians to given levels of public good provision and current policy. In that context, we suggest a novel mechanism by which issuing government debt can affect electoral results. Debt is exploited by an incumbent politician who favors a low level of public good supply, taking advantage of the cost paid by her opponent, who is committed to a higher level of supply. More public debt reduces voters’ preferred level of public good consumption and therefore are less likely to elect the opponent, given her commitment to a losing policy.
Keywords: Voting; Strategic debt; Commitment; Coherence (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D72 H63 D78 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11127-019-00669-5 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Working Paper: Politicians' coherence and government debt (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:182:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s11127-019-00669-5
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... ce/journal/11127/PS2
Access Statistics for this article
Public Choice is currently edited by WIlliam F. Shughart II
More articles in Public Choice from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla ().