Optimal fiscal illusion and the size of government

E. West and Stanley Winer ()

Public Choice, 1980, vol. 35, issue 5, 607-622

Abstract: The interpretation of the long-standing fiscal illusion hypothesis presented here is that the illusion is the result of attempts by utility maximizing public managers (politicians or bureaucrats) to direct the resources of the community toward themselves. In general, they will succeed if the costs of information about or enforcement of managerial behavior are nonzero, and political competition is imperfect. The consequences of this application of the Williamson theory of the firm, in the context of a median voter model, include the following: 1. There will be an optimal level of illusion for the public manager and median voter simultaneously; and this is consistent with the rationality of all agents. 2. Underestimation of tax-prices by the median voter at this point by itself does not imply a continually growing public sector. 3. Misperception of taxes or expenditures alone does not imply anything about the affect of misperception on the size of the budget. For the same reason, a change in information costs is ambiguous (in the present model) in its effects on budget size, because this will influence both tax and expenditure illusions. 4. The importance of tax or expenditure structure manipulation in determining the size of the budget is an empirical question. It may be that the fiscal illusion hypothesis is empirically relevant, or it may not. Whether illusion collapses over time depends on such factors as the age structure of the electorate and the extent of political competition. It is interesting to note, incidentally, that the real ‘hidden persuaders’ may well be in the public sector if competition is more imperfect in political markets than in private. Yet, those who complain about the artificial creation of wants by private business call at the same time for greater government intervention. Copyright Martinus Nijhoff Publishers bv 1980

Date: 1980
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (19)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF00140089 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:35:y:1980:i:5:p:607-622

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... ce/journal/11127/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/BF00140089

Access Statistics for this article

Public Choice is currently edited by WIlliam F. Shughart II

More articles in Public Choice from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().