Expectations about voter choices
Peter Coughlin
Public Choice, 1984, vol. 44, issue 1, 49-59
Abstract:
The only essential differences in the examples analyzed above are in the assumptions that are used to derive or directly specify the choice behavior that the candidates expect from any given voter, conditional on his utility function. When the central behavioral assumption from the traditional models was used, the equilibrium was a median outcome—a conclusion directly analogous to what happens in the corresponding (unidimensional) traditional voting models. When the central behavioral assumptions from the probabilistic voting model developed in Coughlin and Nitzan [1981] were used, the equilibrium was at the maximum of the expected log-utility function—a conclusion directly analogous to what happens in the model in Coughlin and Nitzan [1981]. Indeed, it was only when the corresponding assumptions from Ledyard [1984] were used (i.e., the particular assumptions that Ledyard used to derive the choice behavior that the candidates expect from any given voter, conditional on his utility function) that the conclusions were substantially different from the conclusions derived from earlier models. This reflects the important role these assumptions play in making Ledyard's conclusions about candidate strategies substantially different from earlier results in the literature on spatial models of elections. Copyright Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1984
Date: 1984
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF00124818 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:44:y:1984:i:1:p:49-59
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... ce/journal/11127/PS2
DOI: 10.1007/BF00124818
Access Statistics for this article
Public Choice is currently edited by WIlliam F. Shughart II
More articles in Public Choice from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().