Optimal majorities for decisions of varying importance
Bengt-Arne Wickström
Public Choice, 1986, vol. 48, issue 3, 273-290
Abstract:
It is argued that the theory of the optimal majority for public decision making in its standard formulation is insufficient as a tool to analyze the relationship between different optimal majorities for different kinds of decisions. The theory is reformulated and conditions for optimal majorities for different types of decisions are derived. It is demonstrated how different properties of the sets of potential public projects influence the size of the optimal majority. It is shown that the commonly postulated property that important decisions require a larger majority than less important ones, critically depends on assumptions of risk aversion on the individuals choosing the optimal majority. This paper was written while the author, as an Alexander von Humboldt Research Fellow, was a guest of the Fakultät für Volkswirtschaftslehre und Statistik, Universität Mannheim. The author thanks the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, the Fakultät, and Sonderforschungsbereich 5, Universität Mannheim, for their support. Copyright Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1986
Date: 1986
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF00051625 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:48:y:1986:i:3:p:273-290
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... ce/journal/11127/PS2
DOI: 10.1007/BF00051625
Access Statistics for this article
Public Choice is currently edited by WIlliam F. Shughart II
More articles in Public Choice from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().