EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Candidate selection and voting behavior in France

Howard Rosenthal and Subrata Sen

Public Choice, 1969, vol. 6, issue 1, 92 pages

Abstract: As a measure of the component of electoral change resulting from candidate selection variables, the foregoing regression analysis suggested that about 3% of all voters in the districts considered change their votes as a consequence of candidate selection policies. In competitive elections, these 3% are a highly significant proportion. Since this change largely favors the Gaullists, one can suggest that the French Left (Communist and Non-Communist) has not manipulated candidate selections as successfully as the Gaullists. Although the patterns of variation are different for Gaullist candidates than for Federation or Communist candidates, we have shown that the performances of new candidates differ systematically from those of old, repeat candidates. Thus, we hope this research suggests the interest of looking at candidate selection strategies and the communications psychology of multiple exposures as relevant variables in the study of voting behavior. The early study of voting behavior was largely influenced by looking at thesocial determinants of voting behavior through such variables as social class, religious practice, race, etc. The use of psychological theory in the study of voting behavior has, in fact, largely been confined to the analysis of the cross-pressures evidenced through these social variables. In other works, we have indicated how elite behavior influences voting behavior through coalition decisions. To this we can now partially suggest how elite behavior influences voting behavior through candidate selection decision. With as much empirical knowledge aboutelite influences as we now have aboutsocial influences, the variations in behavior that we must ascribe to the peculiarities of districts and their candidates may well be very minor. Copyright Center for Studies in Public Choice, Department of Economics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute 1969

Date: 1969
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF01718579 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:6:y:1969:i:1:p:71-92

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... ce/journal/11127/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/BF01718579

Access Statistics for this article

Public Choice is currently edited by WIlliam F. Shughart II

More articles in Public Choice from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:6:y:1969:i:1:p:71-92