'Cleaning Up' while Cleaning Up? Pollution Abatement, Interest Groups and Contingent Trade Policies

Michael P Leidy and Bernard Hoekman

Public Choice, 1994, vol. 78, issue 3-4, 58 pages

Abstract: This paper analyzes the political economy of environmental-policy formation in a trading economy with established rules for administered protection. We argue that the social costs associated with the adoption of an inefficient environmental regime are likely to be compounded by induced restrictions on trade when the effected industries are import competing. The preferences of interest groups for alternative environmental regimes tend to be linked to the legal-institutional setting in which trade policy is conducted. Under existing rules and practices in the area of administered protection, there is reason to believe that interest group preferences for an inefficient approach to pollution control will be strengthened because the adoption of such a regime is more likely to lead to a concomitant increase in trade barriers. Copyright 1994 by Kluwer Academic Publishers

Date: 1994
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (21)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Working Paper: 'Cleaning up' while Cleaning up: Pollution Abatement, Interest Groups and Contingent Trade Policies (1991)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:78:y:1994:i:3-4:p:241-58

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... ce/journal/11127/PS2

Access Statistics for this article

Public Choice is currently edited by WIlliam F. Shughart II

More articles in Public Choice from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().