Imperfect Rent Dissipation with Unionized Labor

Martin Rama

Public Choice, 1997, vol. 93, issue 1-2, 55-75

Abstract: Traditional rent-seeking theory focused only on socially wasteful expenditures by firms competing for restrictive regulations. More recently, rent-defending expenditures by consumers have also been taken into account. This paper extends the analysis by adding rent-sharing expenditures by organized labor. The paper merges the Tullock lottery model and the monopoly union model and considers both a costless and a costly wage bargaining mechanism. The participation of consumers and workers in the distributional contest is shown to reduce, rather than increase, the social cost of restrictive regulations. The participation of consumers and workers also raises the probability of deregulation. Copyright 1997 by Kluwer Academic Publishers

Date: 1997
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://journals.kluweronline.com/issn/0048-5829/contents link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:93:y:1997:i:1-2:p:55-75

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... ce/journal/11127/PS2

Access Statistics for this article

Public Choice is currently edited by WIlliam F. Shughart II

More articles in Public Choice from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().