How to Turn an Industry Green: Taxes versus Subsidies
Susanne Dröge and
Journal of Regulatory Economics, 2005, vol. 27, issue 2, 177-202
Environmental policies frequently target the ratio of dirty to green output within the same industry. To achieve such targets, the green sector may be subsidized or the dirty sector be taxed. We show that in a monopolistic competition setting, the two policy approaches have different welfare effects, depending on the design of the instrument (ad valorem versus unit instrument) and the initial situation (size of the dirty sector). For a strong green policy (a severe reduction of the dirty sector) a tax is the dominant instrument. If initially the dirty sector is important, then for moderate policy targets a subsidy may be the superior tool. These findings have implications for policies such as the Californian Zero Emission Bill. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005
Keywords: environmental regulation; monopolistic competition; taxes; subsidies; welfare; Zero Emission Bill (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Working Paper: How to Turn an Industry Green: Taxes versus Subsidies (2003)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:regeco:v:27:y:2005:i:2:p:177-202
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... on/journal/11149/PS2
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Regulatory Economics is currently edited by Michael A. Crew
More articles in Journal of Regulatory Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla ().