Should merchant transmission investment be subject to a must-offer provision?

Gert Brunekreeft () and David M Newbery

Journal of Regulatory Economics, 2006, vol. 30, issue 3, 233-260

Keywords: Investment; Must-offer; Capacity withholding; Regulation; Electricity; L51; L94; L4 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (22)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11149-006-9002-z (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Should Merchant Transmission Investment be Subject to a Must-offer Provision? (2005)
Working Paper: Should Merchant Transmission Investment be subject to a Mustoffer Provision? (2005)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:regeco:v:30:y:2006:i:3:p:233-260

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... on/journal/11149/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s11149-006-9002-z

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Regulatory Economics is currently edited by Menaham Spiegel

More articles in Journal of Regulatory Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().