Capture or contract? The early years of electric utility regulation
Thomas Lyon () and
Nathan Wilson ()
Journal of Regulatory Economics, 2012, vol. 42, issue 3, 225-241
Jarrell (J Law Econ 21:269–295, 1978 ) found that electricity prices fell more slowly in states that adopted state regulation before 1917, suggesting that regulators were “captured” by the interests of the regulated electric utilities. An alternative explanation is that state regulation more credibly protected specialized utility assets from regulatory opportunism than did the municipal franchise contracting that preceded it. We test this alternative hypothesis using a panel of data from the U.S. Electrical Censuses of 1902–1937. We find that the shift from municipal franchise contracting to state regulation was associated with a substantial decrease in investment propensity, an outcome supporting the capture hypothesis. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012
Keywords: Regulatory capture; Transaction cost economics; Electric utilities; K2; L5; L9; N4; N7 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:regeco:v:42:y:2012:i:3:p:225-241
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... on/journal/11149/PS2
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Regulatory Economics is currently edited by Michael A. Crew
More articles in Journal of Regulatory Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla ().