Have customers benefited from electricity retail competition?
Journal of Regulatory Economics, 2015, vol. 47, issue 2, 146-182
Compared to traditional cost-of-service regulation, electricity retail competition may lead to lower costs but higher markups. Thus, the net policy effect on the average electricity retail price is ambiguous. This paper uses a difference-in-difference approach to estimate the policy impact for U.S. states that restructured their electricity retail markets. The results suggest that in restructured states, only residential customers have benefited from significantly lower prices but not commercial or industrial customers. Furthermore, this benefit is transitory and disappears in the long run. Overall, retail competition does not seem to deliver lower electricity prices to retail customers across the board or over time. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015
Keywords: Electricity; Restructuring; Retail choice; retail competition; Difference-in-difference; L52; K23; Q48; D42; D43 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (15) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Working Paper: Have Customers Benefited from Electricity Retail Competition? (2014)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:regeco:v:47:y:2015:i:2:p:146-182
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... on/journal/11149/PS2
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Regulatory Economics is currently edited by Menaham Spiegel
More articles in Journal of Regulatory Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().