Banning information in hiring decisions
Anthony Marino ()
Journal of Regulatory Economics, 2020, vol. 58, issue 1, No 2, 33-58
Abstract Over the past decade, federal, state and local governments have restricted the types and uses of information in hiring and promotion decisions. Examples include the banning of credit reports and criminal records. This paper presents a simple microeconomic model of a competitive labor market and studies the economic effects of information bans. The key trade off is between allocative efficiency and helping a labor type with an undesirable characteristic. We compare information bans to direct subsidies. Moreover, we discuss the case where the ban creates negative feedback on the perceptions of firms considering workers of the bad type.
Keywords: Banning; Information (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J2 L51 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11149-020-09410-3 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:regeco:v:58:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s11149-020-09410-3
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... on/journal/11149/PS2
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Regulatory Economics is currently edited by Menaham Spiegel
More articles in Journal of Regulatory Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().