Toward a Benchmark for Optimal Prudency Policy

Encinosa, William E, and David Sappington

Journal of Regulatory Economics, 1995, vol. 7, issue 2, 30 pages

Abstract: This paper presents a benchmark model of prudency policy. The incidence and the financial implications of optimal prudence reviews are examined in a stylized setting. In the environment considered, prudence reviews optimally occur following particularly unfavorable performance by the regulated firm, and they impose expected penalties on the firm. However, rewards as well as penalties from prudence reviews are generally optimal. Furthermore, the risk and expected penalties associated with prudence reviews decline as the regulator's ex ante assessment of the firm's activities becomes more favorable. Copyright 1995 by Kluwer Academic Publishers

Date: 1995
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:regeco:v:7:y:1995:i:2:p:111-30

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... on/journal/11149/PS2

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Regulatory Economics is currently edited by Menaham Spiegel

More articles in Journal of Regulatory Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().