Expectation in Austrian business cycle theory: Market share matters
Nicolas Cachanosky ()
The Review of Austrian Economics, 2015, vol. 28, issue 2, 151-165
One of the most important objections to the Mises-Hayek business cycle theory is the rational expectations critique. The debate between supporters and critics of the Mises-Hayek theory has not paid sufficient attention to the problem of differences in expectations and the market share in the allocation of production factors. I represent financially the effects that occur under the Austrian business cycle theory in the market of production factors as well as how economic imbalances occur when a central bank follows an expansionary policy and entrepreneurs have different expectations. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015
Keywords: Austrian business cycle theory; Rational expectations; Market share; EVA(R); Economic value added (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:revaec:v:28:y:2015:i:2:p:151-165
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... ce/journal/11138/PS2
Access Statistics for this article
The Review of Austrian Economics is currently edited by Peter Boettke and Christopher Coyne
More articles in The Review of Austrian Economics from Springer, Society for the Development of Austrian Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla ().