The impact of risk retention on the pricing of securitizations

Martin Hibbeln () and Werner Osterkamp
Additional contact information
Martin Hibbeln: University of Duisburg-Essen
Werner Osterkamp: University of Duisburg-Essen

Review of Derivatives Research, 2025, vol. 28, issue 1, No 2, 24 pages

Abstract: Abstract Loan screening and monitoring are critical to loan performance, but incentives are diminished for securitized loans. Risk retention is intended to harmonize the interests of originators and investors; however, it is unclear to what extent investors anticipate and respond to originators’ screening and monitoring incentives, particularly with respect to different types of risk retention. The theoretical literature suggests that equity retention is optimal in terms of screening efforts; thus, if investors anticipate these incentives, equity retention should lead to low credit spreads. Employing OLS and instrumental variables regressions, we empirically examine the effect of retention on spreads. Our analysis, based on a unique dataset of securitizations, reveals that the effects highly depend on the considered investment type. Credit spreads decrease by approx. 26 to 39 bps if the originator retains a material fraction of at least 5% of the deal’s nominal value. For tranches with high information sensitivity—where screening and monitoring incentives are most critical—investors, though, impose an additional risk premium of 120 basis points when originators fail to retain a substantial portion of the securitizations. In addition, we find that transactions with vertical slice retention are associated with a notably higher risk premium than those with equity retention, demonstrating the differential impact of retention structures on investor perceptions. Overall, our results underline that the extent of asymmetric information, particularly with respect to different types of investments and risk retention, is an important component in the pricing of securitizations.

Keywords: Security design; Asset-backed securities; Retention; Credit spreads (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D82 G01 G21 G24 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11147-025-09209-4 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:revdev:v:28:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11147-025-09209-4

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... 29/journal/11147/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s11147-025-09209-4

Access Statistics for this article

Review of Derivatives Research is currently edited by Gurdip Bakshi and Dilip Madan

More articles in Review of Derivatives Research from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().