Merger Guidelines and the Limits of Our Understanding
Peter C. Carstensen ()
Additional contact information
Peter C. Carstensen: University of Wisconsin Law School
Review of Industrial Organization, 2018, vol. 53, issue 3, 477-506
Abstract The merger guidelines have evolved from a structural standard for determining the legality of mergers to an open-ended evaluation that attempts to predict whether some specific harm to competition is likely. These efforts have been unsuccessful; moreover, mergers generally contribute no positive economic gain. Blocking mergers that may have little or no adverse effect on competition will not cause significant economic harm; but the failure to interdict mergers that do cause harm imposes significant costs on the economy. Merger enforcement policy should return to the structural method of the 1968 Guidelines as well as impose stricter structural standards.
Keywords: Market structure; Merger policy; Competition law (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11151-018-9661-9 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:revind:v:53:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s11151-018-9661-9
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... on/journal/11151/PS2
Access Statistics for this article
Review of Industrial Organization is currently edited by L.J. White
More articles in Review of Industrial Organization from Springer, The Industrial Organization Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla ().