How accurate are modern Value-at-Risk estimators derived from extreme value theory?
Benjamin Mögel () and
Benjamin R. Auer ()
Additional contact information
Benjamin Mögel: University of Leipzig
Benjamin R. Auer: University of Leipzig
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 2018, vol. 50, issue 4, 979-1030
Abstract In this study, we compare the out-of-sample forecasting performance of several modern Value-at-Risk (VaR) estimators derived from extreme value theory (EVT). Specifically, in a multi-asset study covering 30 years of stock, bond, commodity and currency market data, we analyse the accuracy of the classic generalised Pareto peak over threshold approach and three recently proposed methods based on the Box–Cox transformation, L-moment estimation and the Johnson system of distributions. We find that, in their unconditional form, some of the estimators may be acceptable under current regulatory assessment rules but none of them can continuously pass more advanced tests of forecasting accuracy. In their conditional forms, forecasting power is significantly increased and the Box–Cox method proves to be the most promising estimator. However, it is also important to stress that the traditional historical simulation approach, which is currently the most frequently used VaR estimator in commercial banks, can not only keep up with the EVT-based methods but occasionally even outperforms them (depending on the setting: unconditional versus conditional). Thus, recent claims to generally replace this simple method by theoretically more advanced EVT-based methods may be premature.
Keywords: Value-at-Risk; Extreme value theory; Historical simulation; Backtest; Financial crisis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G10 G11 G17 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11156-017-0652-y Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:rqfnac:v:50:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s11156-017-0652-y
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting is currently edited by Cheng-Few Lee
More articles in Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla ().