Did SFAS 141/142 improve the market’s understanding of net assets, goodwill, or other intangible assets?

Peter M. Johnson (), Thomas J. Lopez () and Trevor L. Sorensen ()
Additional contact information
Peter M. Johnson: University of Alabama
Thomas J. Lopez: University of Alabama
Trevor L. Sorensen: West Virginia University

Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 2021, vol. 56, issue 3, No 3, 915 pages

Abstract: Abstract Statement of Financial Accounting Standards nos. 141 and 142 eliminated the pooling method of accounting for acquisitions and altered the accounting for intangible assets, respectively. The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) asserts that as a result of these changes financial statement users (i.e., market participants) will be “better able to understand the investments” made and have an improved “ability to assess the future profitability and cash flows” derived from these assets. In this paper, we address whether the FASB accomplished its goals with these new standards. We utilize an OLS regression to assess investors’ ability to forecast a firms’ future performance and to determine whether the information related to these accounting changes are impounded into market prices. The overall evidence partially supports FASB’s assertion of providing better information. While there is a significant improvement in market participants’ ability to assess the future economic benefits associated with goodwill, there does not appear to be any improvement in the market’s ability to understand the future implications of other intangible assets or net assets in general.

Keywords: Goodwill; Intangible assets; SFAS 141; SFAS 142; Market efficiency (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G14 M41 M48 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11156-020-00912-x Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:rqfnac:v:56:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s11156-020-00912-x

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/finance/journal/11156/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s11156-020-00912-x

Access Statistics for this article

Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting is currently edited by Cheng-Few Lee

More articles in Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().