How do auditors respond to accounting restatements? Evidence on audit staff allocation
Wuchun Chi () and
Chien-min Kevin Pan ()
Additional contact information
Wuchun Chi: National Chengchi University
Chien-min Kevin Pan: National Chengchi University
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 2022, vol. 58, issue 2, No 13, 847-879
Abstract:
Abstract We examine how auditors respond to accounting restatements using audit input data from Japan. We find that audit fees, the number of Certified Public Accountant (CPA) licensed staff, and the number of signing partners are higher for firms in the restatement year than in the year prior to the restatement. Our results also reveal that the increase in audit fees and the higher numbers of CPA-licensed staff and signing partners persist after the restatement year. The results are robust after excluding dismissal of auditors subsequent to the occurrence of restatements. We further find that client firms are not able to gain a fee discount but will be audited by greater numbers of partners if they switch auditors after the restatement. We also obtain consistent results using propensity score matching. Overall, our findings suggest that audit firms increase audit inputs (i.e., higher fees and more experienced staff with a CPA license) in response to their own mistakes (i.e., accounting restatements). Taken together, the results suggest that the increased audit fees may reflect the increase in the risks, but not the risks alone.
Keywords: Restatement; Misstatement; Audit inputs; Staff allocation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: M41 M42 M48 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11156-021-01011-1 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:rqfnac:v:58:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s11156-021-01011-1
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/finance/journal/11156/PS2
DOI: 10.1007/s11156-021-01011-1
Access Statistics for this article
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting is currently edited by Cheng-Few Lee
More articles in Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().