Limiting environmental reporting flexibility: investor judgment based on the EU taxonomy
Sandra Chrzan () and
Christiane Pott ()
Additional contact information
Sandra Chrzan: TU Dortmund University
Christiane Pott: TU Dortmund University
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 2024, vol. 63, issue 4, No 12, 1548 pages
Abstract:
Abstract This experimental research investigates the effect of different types of environmental information on investor judgment. By examining three experimental cases varying the level of environmental disclosure, we evaluate the investment judgments of professional (Study 1) and private German investors (Study 2). Primarily, we investigate whether traditional, commonly disclosed environmental information affects investor judgments. Furthermore, we explore the effects of linking non-financial reporting elements to quantitative financial measures through the EU taxonomy by adding taxonomy indicators. Specifically, we operationalized the case where companies fall into a category of poor environmental performance by taxonomy classification. We find that only traditional environmental disclosure in combination with standardized taxonomy-aligned information (below average), influences the investment judgment. However, professional investors exhibit a significantly negative response, while private investors show a significantly positive reaction when constraining reporting flexibility through the inclusion of standardized taxonomy measures with poor performance. Consequently, we conclude that the connection between non-financial reporting elements and quantitative standardized financial measures enhances transparency for professional investors. Private investors, on the other hand, reward additional taxonomy-aligned environmental information irrespective of its content. This implies that environmental information generally conveys positive signals to private investors, but uncertainty in investment judgment can be assumed.
Keywords: EU taxonomy; Investment judgment; Non-financial disclosure; CSR reporting; ESG investment; Experimental study (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11156-024-01297-x Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:rqfnac:v:63:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s11156-024-01297-x
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/finance/journal/11156/PS2
DOI: 10.1007/s11156-024-01297-x
Access Statistics for this article
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting is currently edited by Cheng-Few Lee
More articles in Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().