Reconsidering the common ratio effect: the roles of compound independence, reduction, and coalescing

Ulrich Schmidt and Christian Seidl

Theory and Decision, 2014, vol. 77, issue 3, 323-339

Abstract: Common ratio effects should be ruled out if subjects’ preferences satisfy compound independence, reduction of compound lotteries, and coalescing. In other words, at least one of these axioms should be violated in order to generate a common ratio effect. Relying on a simple experiment, we investigate which failure of these axioms is concomitant with the empirical observation of common ratio effects. We observe that compound independence and reduction of compound lotteries hold, whereas coalescing is systematically violated. This result provides support for theories which explain the common ratio effect by violations of coalescing (i.e., configural weight theory) instead of violations of compound independence (i.e., rank-dependent utility or cumulative prospect theory). Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Keywords: Common ratio effect; Coalescing; Reduction; Compound independence; Event splitting; Branch splitting; Isolation effect; Allais paradox; C91; C44; D81 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11238-014-9456-x (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Reconsidering the common ratio effect: The roles of compound independence, reduction, and coalescing (2014)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:theord:v:77:y:2014:i:3:p:323-339

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... ry/journal/11238/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s11238-014-9456-x

Access Statistics for this article

Theory and Decision is currently edited by Mohammed Abdellaoui

More articles in Theory and Decision from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().