Communication, leadership and coordination failure
Lu Dong (),
Maria Montero () and
Alex Possajennikov ()
Additional contact information
Lu Dong: University of Nottingham
Theory and Decision, 2018, vol. 84, issue 4, No 4, 557-584
Abstract We investigate the limits of communication and leadership in avoiding coordination failure in minimum effort games. Our environment is challenging, with low benefits of coordination relative to the effort cost. We consider two leader types: cheap-talk leader-communicators who suggest an effort level, and first-mover leaders who lead by example. Both types of leadership have some ability to increase effort in groups with no history, but are insufficient in groups with a history of low effort. Using the strategy method for followers’ responses, we attribute the persistence of coordination failure to the presence of followers who do not follow the leader.
Keywords: Minimum effort game; Coordination failure; Communication; Leadership (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11238-017-9617-9 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Working Paper: Communication, Leadership and Coordination Failure (2015)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:theord:v:84:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s11238-017-9617-9
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... ry/journal/11238/PS2
Access Statistics for this article
Theory and Decision is currently edited by Mohammed Abdellaoui
More articles in Theory and Decision from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().