The wisdom of collective grading and the effects of epistemic and semantic diversity
Aidan Lyon and
Michael Morreau ()
Additional contact information
Aidan Lyon: University of Maryland at College Park
Michael Morreau: UiT-The Arctic University of Norway
Theory and Decision, 2018, vol. 85, issue 1, 99-116
Abstract A computer simulation is used to study collective judgements that an expert panel reaches on the basis of qualitative probability judgements contributed by individual members. The simulated panel displays a strong and robust crowd wisdom effect. The panel’s performance is better when members contribute precise probability estimates instead of qualitative judgements, but not by much. Surprisingly, it does not always hurt for panel members to interpret the probability expressions differently. Indeed, coordinating their understandings can be much worse.
Keywords: Qualitative probability; Scores and grades; Wisdom of crowds; Computer modeling (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11238-017-9643-7 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:theord:v:85:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s11238-017-9643-7
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... ry/journal/11238/PS2
Access Statistics for this article
Theory and Decision is currently edited by Mohammed Abdellaoui
More articles in Theory and Decision from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla ().