# Persuasion under ambiguity

Jonas Hedlund (), T. Florian Kauffeldt () and Malte Lammert ()
Jonas Hedlund: University of Texas at Dallas
T. Florian Kauffeldt: Heilbron University
Malte Lammert: University of California

Theory and Decision, 2021, vol. 90, issue 3, No 7, 455-482

Abstract: Abstract This paper introduces a receiver who perceives ambiguity in a binary model of Bayesian persuasion. The sender has a well-defined prior, while the receiver considers an interval of priors and maximizes a convex combination of worst and best expected payoffs ( $$\alpha$$ α -maxmin preferences). We characterize the sender’s optimal signal and find that the receiver’s payoff differences across states given each action (sensitivities), play a fundamental role in the characterization and the comparative statics. If the sender’s preferred action is the least (most) sensitive one, then the sender’s equilibrium payoff, as well as the sender’s preferred degree of receiver ambiguity, is increasing (decreasing) in the receiver’s pessimism. We document a tendency for ambiguity-sensitive receivers to be more difficult to persuade.

Keywords: Persuasion; Ambiguity; Signaling; Information transmission (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... ry/journal/11238/PS2