EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The impact of experience on decisions based on pre-choice samples and the face-or-cue hypothesis

Ido Erev (), Ofir Yakobi, Nathaniel J. S. Ashby and Nick Chater
Additional contact information
Ido Erev: Technion
Ofir Yakobi: University of Waterloo
Nathaniel J. S. Ashby: Harrisburg University of Science and Technology
Nick Chater: University of Warwick

Theory and Decision, 2022, vol. 92, issue 3, No 8, 583-598

Abstract: Abstract The growing literature on how people learn to make decisions based on experience focuses on two types of paradigms. In one paradigm, people are faced with a choice, and must retrospectively consult past experience of similar choices to decide what to do. In the other paradigm, people are faced with a choice, and then have the opportunity prospectively to gather new experiences that might help them make that choice. The current paper examines the joint impact of both retrospective and prospective experiences. Two experiments reveal strong interactions. In Study 1, repeated experience with new samples appears to reduce sensitivity to the average outcome in the samples and enhances underweighting of rare events. Study 2 shows that repeated experience with pre-choice samples can reverse the impact of the new information (and decrease the tendency to select the alternative that provides the best outcome in the new sample). The results suggest that prospectively gathering new samples can have two, potentially contrasting, influences on choice: the first focuses on the sample’s face value and selects the option with the higher value in the new sample; by contrast, the second treats the new sample as a cue to recall similar prior experiences, which in turn drive choice. The paper concludes with a discussion of the possibility that part of the descriptive value of prospect theory reflects the fact that it summarizes the joint impact of similar “face-or-cue” processes.

Keywords: Decisions from experience; Sampling paradigm; Clicking paradigm; Choice variability; Learning (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11238-021-09856-7 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:theord:v:92:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s11238-021-09856-7

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... ry/journal/11238/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s11238-021-09856-7

Access Statistics for this article

Theory and Decision is currently edited by Mohammed Abdellaoui

More articles in Theory and Decision from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2022-05-12
Handle: RePEc:kap:theord:v:92:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s11238-021-09856-7