Suspicious minds and views of fairness
Øivind Schøyen ()
Additional contact information
Øivind Schøyen: UiT The Arctic University of Norway
Theory and Decision, 2024, vol. 97, issue 1, No 4, 67-88
Abstract:
Abstract Do people with different views of what is fair attribute different intentions to actions? In a novel experimental design, participants were significantly more likely to attribute a no-redistribution vote to selfishness if they considered redistribution as being fair. I define this—attributing actions that do not adhere to one’s own fairness view to selfishness—as suspicious attribution. I develop a theory of intention attribution to show how suspicious attribution arises from two other findings from the experiment: the participants underestimate the number of people with fairness views differing from their own and overestimate the selfishness of participants with other fairness views. I discuss how the findings can help explain political polarization.
Keywords: Attribution; Projection bias; Redistribution; Fairness view; Morality; Polarization (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11238-023-09965-5 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:theord:v:97:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s11238-023-09965-5
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... ry/journal/11238/PS2
DOI: 10.1007/s11238-023-09965-5
Access Statistics for this article
Theory and Decision is currently edited by Mohammed Abdellaoui
More articles in Theory and Decision from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().