What are the determinants of the willingness to share rides in pooled on-demand services?
María J. Alonso-González (),
Oded Cats,
Niels van Oort,
Sascha Hoogendoorn-Lanser and
Serge Hoogendoorn
Additional contact information
María J. Alonso-González: Delft University of Technology
Oded Cats: Delft University of Technology
Niels van Oort: Delft University of Technology
Sascha Hoogendoorn-Lanser: KiM Netherlands Institute for Transport Policy Analysis
Serge Hoogendoorn: Delft University of Technology
Transportation, 2021, vol. 48, issue 4, No 9, 1733-1765
Abstract:
Abstract Simulation studies suggest that pooled on-demand services (also referred to as Demand Responsive Transport, ridesharing, shared ride-hailing or shared ridesourcing services) have the potential to bring large benefits to urban areas while inducing limited time losses for their users. However, in reality, the large majority of users request individual rides (and not pooled rides) in existing on-demand services, leading to increases in motorised vehicle miles travelled. In this study, we investigate to what extent fare discounts, additional travel time, and the (un)willingness to share the ride with (different numbers of) other passengers play a role in the decision of individuals to share rides. To this end, we design a stated preference study targeting Dutch urban individuals. In our research, we (1) disentangle the sharing aspect from related time–cost trade-offs (e.g. detours), (2) investigate preference heterogeneity regarding the studied attributes and identify distinct market segments, and (3) simulate scenarios to understand the impact of the obtained parameters in the breakdown between individual and pooled services. We find that less than one third of respondents have strong preferences against sharing their rides. Also, we find that different market segments vary not only in their values of the willingness to share, but also in how they perceive this willingness to share (per-ride or proportional to the in-vehicle time). Further, the scenario analysis demonstrates that the share of individuals who are willing to share rides depends primarily on the time–cost trade-offs, rather than on the disutility stemming from pooling rides per se.
Keywords: Willingness to share; Ridesharing; DRT; Stated preference; Choice modelling; Scenario analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (12)
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11116-020-10110-2 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:transp:v:48:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s11116-020-10110-2
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... ce/journal/11116/PS2
DOI: 10.1007/s11116-020-10110-2
Access Statistics for this article
Transportation is currently edited by Kay W. Axhausen
More articles in Transportation from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().