Assessing the Risk of Fraud at Olympus and Identifying an Effective Audit Plan

Hironori Fukukawa, Theodore J. Mock and Rajendra P. Srivastava
Additional contact information
Hironori Fukukawa: Graduate School of Commerce and Management, Hitotsubashi University, JAPAN
Theodore J. Mock: School of Business Administration, University of California, Riverside, USA
Rajendra P. Srivastava: School of Business, The University Of Kansas, USA

The Japanese Accounting Review, 2014, vol. 4, 1-25

Abstract: This paper introduces an approach to the assessment of financial statement fraud risk and audit program planning and illustrates its application by simulating its use in the 1999 audit of Olympus. The approach incorporates a rigorous approach to assessing risk and current standards and conventions to fraud risk assessment not in practice during the period when a substantial financial statement fraud occurred at Olympus. The approach described in this paper illustrates a ‘what-if’ analysis that suggests the possible effectiveness of using updated standards, practice and research on detecting financial statement fraud.In the proposed approach, which is based on the Theory of Belief Functions, auditors follow three steps: (1) fraud risk assessment at the overall financial statement level, (2) fraud risk assessment at an account level, and (3) assessment of account, transaction and evidence schemes used to perpetrate fraud. In the evidential network, formal auditor belief assessments concerning evidence obtained in each audit step are aggregated by using Dempster’s rule. High aggregated assessments of belief-in-fraud or plausibility-of-fraud which exceed the thresholds established by the audit firm requires the auditors to engage in further investigation, to heighten the level of professional skepticism, and, where appropriate, to adopt a forensic audit approach.The results of analyzing the 1999 audit of Olympus demonstrate that the applications of current standards applied jointly with our approach would have likely both indicated a high plausibility and belief that fraud existed and would have likely directed the audit team to effective forensic audit procedures.

Keywords: Financial Statement Fraud; Forensic Audit Procedures; Design Science; Theory of Belief Functions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D81 M42 M48 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.rieb.kobe-u.ac.jp/tjar/article/vol4/pd ... k_and_Srivastava.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kob:tjrevi:dec2014:v:4:p:1-25

Access Statistics for this article

The Japanese Accounting Review is currently edited by Hidetoshi Yamaji

More articles in The Japanese Accounting Review from Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by TJAR Editorial Office ().