Pros and Cons of Teaching and Research in the History of Economic Thought Today
Jimena Hurtado Prieto () and
Andrés Álvarez ()
Lecturas de Economía, 2010, issue 73, 275-301
This article intends to rebut the arguments against teaching and research in the history of economic thought, thus, highlighting its relevance in the academic formation of future economists. In a moment where economics has been questioned for its inability to provide answers and for its fascination with measurement and technique, we believe it is time to advocate and promote history of economic thought as a field of reflection, criticism and introspection. A field that shows future economists that economics is a process and not a product, providing them with the necessary insights to participate actively in the “extended present” of their discipline
Keywords: History of Economic Thought; teaching; research; economic theory (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A11 A13 A14 A22 B2 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:lde:journl:y:2010:i:73:p:275-301
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Lecturas de Economía, Departamento de Economía, Calle 67, 53-108, Medellin 050010, Colombia.
Access Statistics for this article
Lecturas de Economía is currently edited by Catalina Granda-Carvajal
More articles in Lecturas de Economía from Universidad de Antioquia, Departamento de Economía Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Carlos Andrés Vasco Correa ().