The difficulties of the Chinese and Indian exchange rate regimes
Ila Patnaik and
Ajay Shah
European Journal of Comparative Economics, 2009, vol. 6, issue 1, 157-173
Abstract:
China and India have both sought control over the exchange rate in order to maintain export competitiveness, manage current account balance, and pursue independent monetary policy. In this paper, we examine structural change in the Chinese and Indian de facto exchange rate regimes, focusing on the period from 1998 to 2007. With increasing capital account openness, exchange rate inflexibility has been associated with significant monetary policy distortions. In both countries, the short-term rate expressed in real terms dropped, and achieved very low values, in the unprecedented business cycle expansion of the early 2000s. In the Indian case, difficulties of sterilisation led to a modification of the exchange rate regime, moving towards greater flexibility. In China, in contrast, the exchange rate regime did not change.
Keywords: Exchange rate regime; sterilised intervention; monetary policy; India; China (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E52 E58 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (14)
Downloads: (external link)
https://ejce.liuc.it/18242979200901/182429792009060108.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: The difficulties of the Chinese and Indian exchange rate regimes (2009)
Working Paper: The Difficulties of the Chinese and Indian Exchange Rate Regimes (2009)
Working Paper: The difficulties of the Chinese and Indian exchange rate regimes (2009)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:liu:liucej:v:6:y:2009:i:1:p:157-173
Access Statistics for this article
European Journal of Comparative Economics is currently edited by Matteo Migheli, Giovanni Ramello, Koji Domon, Peter Grajzl, David M. Kemme, Marcello Signorelli and Richard Watt
More articles in European Journal of Comparative Economics from Cattaneo University (LIUC) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Laura Ballestra ().