Development Planning & Policies under Mahalanobis Strategy: A Tale of India’s Dilemma
Dr. Asim K. Karmakar
Additional contact information
Dr. Asim K. Karmakar: Assistant Professor,Department of Economics, Jadavpur University,Kolkata 700 032, India.
International Journal of Business and Social Research, 2012, vol. 2, issue 2, 121-132
Abstract:
The designer of India’s Second Five Year Plan (1956-61) was Professor Prasanta Chandra Mahalanobis, who had adopted the simple two sector model of Soviet Planning of Feldman type. He gave top priority to investment goods, as they were crucial for further economic growth of India. The disadvantage of this strategy was capital deepening, that is, the commitment of large amounts of capital to heavy industry, which would yield low returns. At the same time this investment would generate buying power, which could not absorbed due to neglect of consumption goods, and this could lead to inflation.Mahalanobis also designed a four sector model. This time also, he retained the emphasis on investment goods, but divided the other sector into three sub-sectors: (a) industry; (b) agriculture and cottage industry and (c) services, education and health etc. Only one third of the total investment should go to the three sub-sectors as mentioned above. Cottage industry, in particular, was singled out as a major potential producer of consumption goods. The fact that cottage industry required little capital and was labour intensive was highlighted. Of course, for this very reason one could not expect a great deal of savings from cottage industry, which would be required for future economic growth. Heavy industry in the public sector was considered to be the major item once more, as it was the very symbol of economic independence and was thought to be crucial for the maintenance of political independence.In the above backdrop the present paper gives a short review of Mahalanobis strategy of development planning in the context of the then India’s dilemma: dynamic industrialization and static agriculture.
Keywords: Dutch Disease; Contagion; Speculative Attack (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://thejournalofbusiness.org/index.php/site/article/view/197/196 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:lrc:larijb:v:2:y:2012:i:2:p:121-132
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in International Journal of Business and Social Research from LAR Center Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Al Hossain ().