The Problems of Interpretation of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms in the European Court of Human Rights
Ivanets Ivan Petrovich
Additional contact information
Ivanets Ivan Petrovich: Researcher, Department of Private International Law, Kyiv Institute of International Relations of Taras Shevchenko, National University of Kyiv, Address of the institution: Kyiv, str. Melnikova,
International Journal of Business and Social Research, 2014, vol. 4, issue 6, 165-172
Abstract:
According to the clause 1 of Article 32 of the European Convention for the protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of 1950 (herein after referred to as the European Convention or the Convention) the competence of the European Court of Human Rights (herein after referred to as the Court or the Court) extends to all issues of interpretation and application of the Convention and its protocols. Thus, the European Convention makes the Court the only tool of the way of understanding of the rights and freedoms protected by it. Interpretation of the provisions of Convention lies in the basis of the Court activity as immovable clod that stands guard for protection of human rights, and that is a place where the State is directly responsible before a human.
Keywords: European Convention; Protection of Human Rights; Court; legal systems (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://thejournalofbusiness.org/index.php/site/article/view/529/436 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:lrc:larijb:v:4:y:2014:i:6:p:165-172
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in International Journal of Business and Social Research from LAR Center Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Al Hossain ().