Critical Thinking Master Student Preferred Learning Aids: An Experimental Study

Ph.D. T. Christine Gordon and Ph.D. Veronika Ospina-Kammerer
Additional contact information
Ph.D. T. Christine Gordon: Saint Leo University
Ph.D. Veronika Ospina-Kammerer: Saint Leo University

Review of Social Sciences, 2016, vol. 1, issue 3, 53-57

Abstract: Case Analysis is not new in the realm of learning, use of learning aids and assessment. Critical Thinking requires product design/course, paper completion, and research/ citations in support of the student statements and specific parameters of the paper. Teaching and learning theories (inductive and deductive) and critical thinking are the benchmarks in determining the success of teaching techniques in a course. The deductive method includes a preset assessment. The “Table of Contents” structures student learning. A study, of three online Master student cohort groups, was designed to test for (no) preferences of student course aids with respect to critical thinking, learning and assessment. The Chi Square Goodness of Fit testing shows a statistically significant preference for the “Table of Contents” as a preferred learning aid.

Keywords: Assessment; Chi Square Testing; Critical Thinking; Learning Aid Preference. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.socialsciencejournal.org/index.php/site/article/view/15/16 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:lrc:larrss:v:1:y:2016:i:3:p:53-57

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Review of Social Sciences from LAR Center Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by H Kabir ().