Institutional arrangements governing wetland utilization and conservation in communal areas of Zimbabwe

Thomas Marambanyika () and Heinz Beckedahl
Additional contact information
Thomas Marambanyika: Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Midlands State University, Gweru, Zimbabwe.
Heinz Beckedahl: Department of Geography, Environment Science and Planning, University of Swaziland, Kwaluseni Campus, Kwaluseni, Swaziland.

Review of Social Sciences, 2017, vol. 2, issue 1, 1-17

Abstract: Wetland degradation and loss has persisted in developing countries due to existence of poor institutional frameworks supporting wetland governance. Therefore, wetland ecosystem services that support the livelihoods of most subsistence populations in rural areas are concomitantly lost. This paper explores the nature and consequences of institutional arrangements governing wetland access, utilization and conservation in six communal wetlands in Zimbabwe. Data were collected through a household survey targeting one hundred and twenty-three household heads, sixty teenagers and key informant interviews. The results of the study indicate a complex, multi-institutional involvement and the roles and relationship of participating institutions often compromise wetland resources conservation as a result of conflicts, confusion and tensions exacerbated by divergent motives. There is no homogeny in the number of institutions determining utilization at each wetland nor their degree of influence on management decisions;a situation reflecting inconsistency in existing institutional structure at communal level. Given the proximity of traditional leaders and wetland committees to the people and wetlands and the poor participation of government agencies, an institutional structure which places local institutions at the core of the governance system should be formulated. This shouldbe complemented by a clear framework which promotes co-ordination of institutional roles and clarification of their relationships in order to minimize discord in execution of their duties; a situation that currently contributes todegradation of wetland ecosystems. The necessary policy and legal framework to support such institutional framework should be put in place and resources for its operations made available. Classification JEL: Q01, Q15, Q24, Q25, Q28

Keywords: Local Communities; Wetland Governance; Wetland Management; Stakeholder Participation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.socialsciencejournal.org/index.php/site/article/view/71/38 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:lrc:larrss:v:2:y:2017:i:1:p:1-17

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Review of Social Sciences from LAR Center Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by H Kabir ().