Pre-Trial Probation As A Way To Ensure The Protection Of The Defendant’s Rights

Oksana Melenko ()
Additional contact information
Oksana Melenko: Associate Professor, the Department of Legal Psychology, Yuriy Fedkovych National University of Chernivtsi, Chernivtsi, Ukraine

European Journal of Law and Public Administration, 2018, vol. 5, issue 2, 15-22

Abstract: Within the framework of Ukraine’s European integration and the development of its legal system, there arises a need for introducing an efficient mechanism, which would make up for convicts’ rehabilitation, as well as establish some control over their behavior. The institution of probation seems to be the very mechanism that is able to fulfil the above task, as well as to protect our society, prevent repetitive crimes and stipulate the criminal’s reintegration into the society. The essence of probation lies in establishing control over the convict by obliging him to do certain things and restricting his freedom, without isolating him from the society (to attend probation centers, to meet a supervisory officer, to participate in various activities, etc.) One of the most important functions, performed by the probation service, is a pretrial one. It is administered in the process of investigating the crime, together with other investigative actions, by the bodies of inquiry. This pre-trial function presupposes collecting information about the criminal, with the purpose of assisting the court in determining the most relevant punishment (either imprisonment or some other alternative sentence). In this way, implementing the rule of law and ensuring human rights, the legislation allows the defendant to take a direct part: in making up his social-psychological characteristics; in specifying any information concerning his involvement in the committed crime; in compiling a pre-trial report; in receiving information on the procedure of compiling and applying the pre-trial report; in providing the probation officer with all the information, required by the report. In case of biased treatment, a defendant can withdraw a probation officer. Any accused individual has an indisputable right to make his own comments and specifications in the process of making up a pre-trial report, as well to refuse to sign it.

Keywords: probation; pre-trial probation; pre-trial report; program of probation; probation standards; social rehabilitation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H7 K10 K15 K33 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/ejlpa/article/view/867 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:lum:ejlpa1:v:5:y:2018:i:2:p:15-22

DOI: 10.18662/eljpa/38

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in European Journal of Law and Public Administration from Editura LUMEN
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Antonio Sandu ().