A Linguistic and Philosophical Analysis of Anthropological Paradigms

Yurii Stezhko (), Vira Drabovska (), Liudmyla Gusak (), Elina Koliada (), Ilona Derik () and Svitlana Hrushko ()
Additional contact information
Yurii Stezhko: Aviation University, Kiev, Ukraine
Vira Drabovska: Vinnytsia Cooperative Institute, Vinnytsia, Ukraine
Liudmyla Gusak: Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University, Lutsk, Ukraine
Elina Koliada: Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University, Lutsk, Ukraine
Ilona Derik: State Institution "South Ukrainian National PedagogicalUniversity named after K.D. Ushynsky", Odesa, Ukraine
Svitlana Hrushko: State Institution "South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University named after K.D. Ushynsky", Odesa, Ukraine

Postmodern Openings, 2021, vol. 12, issue 1Sup1, 287-301

Abstract: The article justifies the need to involve philosophy in specific scientific research due to the ineffectiveness of verbal-and-figurative models and the inadequacy of character education. Indeed, philosophy can increase their theoretical and applied effectiveness in the long-term methodological perspective. The article shows the wrong side of limitations in specific scientific research imposed by an interdisciplinary methodology. It points out to the disadvantages of applying interdisciplinary methods in psycholinguistics, such as analysis synthesis, induction and deduction. The article expands the range of their understanding to achieve a higher level of reliability. Besides, it proves the inadequacy of conclusions obtained mainly from superficial empirical studies without revealing and analyzing their main causes, it being a violation of the determinism principle. It substantiates the need to comply with methodological principles of objectivity and systematicity while analyzing the concepts of the humanities block. If one ignores these principles, it can lead to eÑ lecticity and, hence, the inefficiency of specific scientific research. The effectiveness of methodological principles in psycholinguistics is shown through a consistent analysis of freedom as a philosophical category, as well as a gradual analysis of the links between such concepts as freedom - responsibility, freedom - arbitrariness - responsibility, freedom - interest - arbitrariness.

Keywords: individual; methodology; method; freedom; responsibility; arbitrariness; interest; education (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H0 I2 O0 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/po/article/view/3246 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:lum:rev3rl:v:12:y:2021:i:1sup1:p:287-301

DOI: 10.18662/po/12.1Sup1/285

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Postmodern Openings from Editura Lumen, Department of Economics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Antonio Sandu ().