Judicial Review of a Contract Versus the Principle of Binding Force

Camelia Ignătescu ()
Additional contact information
Camelia Ignătescu: Lecturer PhD, Stefan Cel Mare University of Suceava, Faculty of Economics and Public Administration;

Jurnalul de Studii Juridice, 2013, vol. 3-4, 151-160

Abstract: In the legislation prior to October1, 2011, the cases in which the court could intervene and modify the contract were very few, conditions for exercising such prerogatives being specifically indicated. The present Civil Code is crossed by the idea of recognizing a court’s intervention power on the contract, much higher compared to the old regulation, in accordance with other states’legislation and the international law. In this paper we examine whether the principle of the binding force of a contract does not preclude the recognition of a right to judicial review of a contract.

Keywords: judicial review of a contract; the principle of binding force (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A23 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.journaloflegalstudies.info/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:lum:rev4rl:v:3-4:y:2013:i::p:151-160

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Jurnalul de Studii Juridice from Editura Lumen, Department of Economics on Behalf of Petre Andrei University Iasi
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Antonio Sandu ().