Pflege und Gesundheit – zwei ungleiche Schwestern?: Marktversagenstatbestände und institutionelle Konsequenzen
Sundmacher Torsten ()
Additional contact information
Sundmacher Torsten: Universität Duisburg-Essen, Campus Duisburg, Fachbereich Betriebswirtschaft, Lehrstuhl für Wirtschaftspolitik, Lotharstraße 65, 47048 Duisburg
Review of Economics, 2007, vol. 58, issue 2, 180-202
Abstract:
The Social Long-term Care Insurance (Gesetzliche Pflegeversicherung, GPV) is in a crisis which will clearly intensify without reforms. An important solution strategy is the introduction of competition elements. This concerns the competition between the Long-term Care Insurance as well as the competition between the service providers. In comparison to the Social Health Insurance (Gesetzliche Krankenvereicherung, GKV) this coordination procedure can be found up to now very rarely. It is examined with the help of the market failure theory which market problems can be found in the area of long-term care. Here, nursing goods as well as the market for nursing insurances are examined. In comparison to the GKV, the lacking consumer’s sovereignty and problems with principal-agent-relations aggravate the situation in the GPV. However, other market failures are rather less important. An enlarged discussion of differences between GPV and GKV leads to the question of the institutional arrangement. This concerns on the one hand the possible amount of market and competition in the GPV as well as, on the other hand, the relation between GKV and GPV. In particular the interface problems between both social insurance systems are discussed.
Date: 2007
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/roe-2007-0205 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:lus:reveco:v:58:y:2007:i:2:p:180-202
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/roe/html
DOI: 10.1515/roe-2007-0205
Access Statistics for this article
Review of Economics is currently edited by Michael Berlemann
More articles in Review of Economics from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().