Grundeinkommen vs. Kombilohn: Beschäftigungs- und Finanzierungswirkungen und Unterschiede im Empfängerkreis
Clemens Fuest and
Andreas Peichl
Review of Economics, 2008, vol. 59, issue 2, 94-113
Abstract:
The economic literature often argues that basic income schemes and low wage subsidies to employees are just special cases of a negative income tax. In this debate, it is ignored that these concepts target different population subgroups. This paper investigates the different target groups and the particular implications on government budget and labour supply. A basic income scheme doubles the number of net benefit receiving persons whereas a more targeted wage subsidy increases this number by only 10 %. These differences explain why wage subsidy programs can be financed and evoke positive labour supply effects, while basic income schemes either lead to high costs or to negative employment effects.
Date: 2008
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/roe-2008-0202 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
Related works:
Working Paper: Grundeinkommen vs. Kombilohn: Beschäftigungs- und Finanzierungswirkungen und Unterschiede im Empfängerkreis (2009) 
Working Paper: Grundeinkommen vs. Kombilohn: Beschäftigungs- und Finanzierungswirkungen und Unterschiede im Empfängerkreis (2007) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:lus:reveco:v:59:y:2008:i:2:p:94-113
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/roe/html
DOI: 10.1515/roe-2008-0202
Access Statistics for this article
Review of Economics is currently edited by Michael Berlemann
More articles in Review of Economics from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().