Layoffs in a Recession and Temporary Employment Subsidies when a Recovery is Expected

Matthias Göcke ()

Review of Economics, 2013, vol. 64, issue 1, 73-84

Abstract: Sunk firing and hiring costs shelter existent employment. This effect is typically amplified by uncertainty due to an option value of waiting. Thus, if (i) sunk firing costs are high, for example due to an employment protection legislation or due to the loss of firm-specific human capital, or if (ii) (after a future recovery) recruiting a new qualified staff is difficult and recession-related losses are expected to be only transitory, firms have to consider labour hoarding as a relevant strategy. In this environment a moderate temporary employment subsidy will be sufficient to avoid layoffs by firms currently operating at losses. Depending on the size of sunk (re-)hiring costs, cyclical layoffs or even permanent job destruction can be avoided by short run subsidies during the beginning of a recession.

Keywords: recession; labour hoarding; sunk firing/hiring costs; employment subsidy; recession; labour hoarding; sunk firing/hiring costs; employment subsidy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/roe-2013-0105 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:lus:reveco:v:64:y:2013:i:1:p:73-84

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/roe/html

DOI: 10.1515/roe-2013-0105

Access Statistics for this article

Review of Economics is currently edited by Michael Berlemann

More articles in Review of Economics from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().