Monetary Policy and Unnatural Low Interest Rates: Secular Stagnation or Financial Repression?

Ad van Riet

Review of Economics, 2019, vol. 70, issue 2, 99-135

Abstract: Market interest rates have been on a declining trend over the past 35 years in all advanced economies, even reaching negative territory in some European jurisdictions. This article reviews two competing explanations for the occurrence of unnatural low interest rates. The secular stagnation hypothesis of Keynesian origin maintains that persistent non-monetary factors have caused a structural excess of desired savings over planned investments which steadily pushed down the equilibrium real interest rate that is consistent with a balanced economy. Major central banks in turn failed to sufficiently lower their monetary policy rates to revive aggregate demand, leading to anaemic economic recoveries and hysteresis effects. By contrast, the financial repression doctrine argues that central banks pursued low interest rates to ease the government budget constraint and serve political objectives. The Austrian School of Economics states that this monetary easing bias sowed the seeds of repeated boom/bust cycles and created economic distortions that dragged down potential growth and the equilibrium real interest rate. The core of the debate appears to be the long-standing controversy about the desirable role for the state in guiding the economy on a higher potential growth path as opposed to relying on the efficiency of market processes in generating prosperity.

Keywords: equilibrium real interest rate; secular stagnation; financial repression; Keynesian economics; Austrian economics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: B22 B53 E12 E43 E58 E62 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/roe-2019-0015 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:lus:reveco:v:70:y:2019:i:2:p:99-135:n:3

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/roe/html

DOI: 10.1515/roe-2019-0015

Access Statistics for this article

Review of Economics is currently edited by Michael Berlemann

More articles in Review of Economics from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().