Werbungskosten oder Subvention? Zur Rechtfertigung der Entfernungspauschale und Perspektiven ihrer Ausgestaltung

Homburg Stefan (), Karrenbrock Holger () and Eekhoff Johann ()
Additional contact information
Homburg Stefan: Leibniz Universitat Hannover, Institut fur Offentliche Finanzen, Konigsworther Platz 1, D-30167 Hannover
Karrenbrock Holger: Universitat Kassel, Fachgebiet Betriebswirtschaftslehre, insbesondere Betriebswirtschaftliche Steuerlehre, Monchebergstrasse 19, 34109 Kassel
Eekhoff Johann: Universitat zu Koln, Wirtschaftspolitisches Seminar, WiSo-Hochhaus, Albertus-Magnus Platz, D-50923 Koln

Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik, 2008, vol. 57, issue 1, 44-72

Abstract: Stefan Homburg points out that in Germany commuting expenses have been deductible from the income tax base for a long time. Germany’s grand coalition has now restricted this deduction. The article analyses whether or not this was justified from an economic point of view. It is shown that, in the long run, the tax treatment of commuting expenses has nothing to do with production efficiency. Commuting rather represents a form of household production. The overall conclusion is that the more restrictive tax treatment seems economically justifiable.Whereas Holger Karrenbrock deals with the arguments of the proponents of the so-called ‘Werkstorprinzip’, a principle which means that for tax purposes the sphere of occupational activity ends at the factory gate. He demonstrates that expenses for commuting to and from work are incomerelated and therefore have to be tax deductible. The commutation to and from work is a condition precedent to income production, and the corresponding expenses solely arise from the taxpayer’s occupation, which both is essential in his opinion.Johann Eekhoff, however, emphasizes that since 2007 costs of commuting in Germany are in principle no longer deductible from taxable income. This change in taxation is appreciated because commuting costs can be substituted by housing costs. Generally speaking, the sum of both cost factors is the same at any distances from work. Only for married couples costs of a second household near the workplace should be tax-deductible if both partners are employed at different places.

Date: 2008
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/zfwp-2008-0104 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:lus:zwipol:v:57:y:2008:i:1:p:44-72

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/zfwp/html

DOI: 10.1515/zfwp-2008-0104

Access Statistics for this article

Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik is currently edited by Juergen B. Donges, Steffen J. Roth, Achim Wambach and Christian Watrin

More articles in Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().