Reversing the Burden of Proof in Electronic Banking (in Persian)

Hamid Ghanbari ()
Additional contact information
Hamid Ghanbari: Iran

Journal of Monetary and Banking Research (فصلنامه پژوهش‌های پولی-بانکی), 2012, vol. 4, issue 12, 127-144

Abstract: One of the important points in electronic banking is that in a dispute between a bank and a customer who shall bear the burden of proof? While in traditional system of evidence, the claimant bears the burden of proof, special realities in electronic banking make use of this system difficult. This article argues that justice requires that in banking disputes the bank shall bear the burden of proof whether the bank is claimant or defendant and at the same time the dual system based on risk and fault should be established for such disputes between bank and client. JEL Classification: G21, K20

Keywords: Electronic Banking; Civil Responsibility; Error Theory; Risk Theory; Assumed Fault (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://jmbr.mbri.ac.ir/article-1-116-en.pdf (application/pdf)
http://jmbr.mbri.ac.ir/article-1-116-en.html (text/html)
http://jmbr.mbri.ac.ir/article-1-116-fa.html (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mbr:jmbres:v:4:y:2012:i:12:p:127-144

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Monetary and Banking Research (فصلنامه پژوهش‌های پولی-بانکی) from Monetary and Banking Research Institute, Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by M. E. ().