Why Does Liquidity Matter in Investment Equations?
Bob Chirinko () and
Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 1995, vol. 27, issue 2, 527-48
That liquidity variables affect investment spending is widely accepted. Despite important recent empirical work, questions remain concerning the interpretation of liquidity variables in investment equations and the sources and economic importance of finance constraints. These questions are addressed by estimating a variety of econometric models that exploit distinctive Canadian institutional features to identify firms that face relatively severe information problems. The initial econometric evidence confirms the existence of finance constraints, and identifies their source as the problems faced by firms in credibly communicating private information to outsiders. This conclusion is robust to biases from the capitalization of finance constraints into asset prices, scale economies, or imperfect competition, which are accounted for directly in the econometric specifications. Copyright 1995 by Ohio State University Press.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (124) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0022-2879%2819950 ... 0.CO%3B2-H&origin=bc full text (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.
Working Paper: Why does liquidity matter in investment equations? (1993)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mcb:jmoncb:v:27:y:1995:i:2:p:527-48
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Money, Credit and Banking is currently edited by Robert deYoung, Paul Evans, Pok-Sang Lam and Kenneth D. West
More articles in Journal of Money, Credit and Banking from Blackwell Publishing
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing ().