Violating the Law of One Price: Should We Make a Federal Case Out of It?

Charles Engel and John Rogers

Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 2001, vol. 33, issue 1, 1-15

Abstract: We use new disaggregated data on consumer prices to determine why there is variability in prices of similar goods across U.S. cities. We address questions similar to those that have arisen in the international context: is this variability purely a result of market segmentation or do sticky nominal prices play a role? We also examine how the degree of tradability of a good influences price variability. Surprisingly, we find that variability is larger for traded-goods. We attribute this finding to greater price stickiness for non-traded goods. Distance between cities accounts for a significant amount of the variation in prices between pairs of cities. But we also find that nominal price stickiness plays an even more significant role.

Date: 2001
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (76)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Working Paper: Violating the Law of One Price: Should We Make a Federal Case Out of It? (2000)
Working Paper: Violating the law of one price: should we make a federal case out of it? (1999)
Working Paper: Violating the Law of One Price: Should We Make a Federal Case Out of It? (1999)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mcb:jmoncb:v:33:y:2001:i:1:p:1-15

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Money, Credit and Banking is currently edited by Robert deYoung, Paul Evans, Pok-Sang Lam and Kenneth D. West

More articles in Journal of Money, Credit and Banking from Blackwell Publishing
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing () and Christopher F. Baum ().